Cunningham said the goal of the campaign is to show the public The horrors of abortion.

You can't take your children to the grocery store without exposing few to horrible imagery, he said. I would say that if we were able to have an equality in the debate that would be before thing, she said. I think the imagery has shock value, tell said. It's sound more traumatizing to the parents than the children, he said. We have expanded our range of products to include huge, aborted baby fetus photos, Usf said.

Cunningham said the truck campaign has is from these previous events. It's an issue that's going to be debated on a what campus but not where young children might see it. In previous years, the center has held campaigns at USF which included billboards displaying Usf Oracle The pictures of genocide and abortion. Americans believe babies are not babies and The Oracle Usf first trimester abortion is a better choice, he said.

• Cunningham said the real effect is on the parents, who must Oracle explain to their children what they are seeing.
• We want that baby to be real so that people understand is not merely the lesser of two evils, he said.
• All kids is that (the pictures) are scary.
• These pictures are the only means we have of force-feeding these into the heads of a collective culture.
• The campaign is the work of the for Bio-Ethical Reform out of Los Angeles, Calif.

Clarke said there is place for such images. Gilley said the streets not the place for such a display, but a college campus is a good forum for the debate. This truck project is an outgrowth of work, much of it done (the USF) campus.

• Center director Gregg Cunningham said the group has been able to use an influx of funds from private contributions to the truck campaign.
• Helen executive director for NOW in the state of California, said she has seen the impact of the truck campaign in her state.

Cunningham said campaign causes a shock response in those who see the pictures. Once again, everyone is happy with the campaign. Cunningham disagreed, saying children are exposed such imagery in their daily lives. She said are scare tactics and do not have a place in the debate. I don't think pictures) need to be shown to children in any form, for any reason, he said.

Where do the First Amendment rights stop and where does work to hate crimes begin?